Can you dismiss employees who can’t fulfil
Monday, 13th October 2014, by Loran McDougall
In today's Workplace Bulletin:
Recently we looked at when you can request medical information from employees. The bulletin focused on the obligations and restrictions on you, as an employer.
Today, we explore a recent case which looks at the other side of things – specifically, what are employees’ obligations, and what can you do if they don’t meet them?
As Charles Power details below, this recent Fair Work Commission ruling indicates that employees must engage fully with employers who make a reasonable request for information about the employee’s capacity to fulfil their duties without compromising their own health and safety, or the health and safety of other employees.
Before you dismiss an employee for poor performance at work, you should allow them the opportunity to rectify the issue. Poor work performance will rarely justify immediate dismissal.
There is a specific process you should follow to manage an underperforming employee before you dismiss them. You can find out more here.
Until next time,
Case Law: Dismissing an employee for
failing to provide medical information
by Charles PowerThat employees must engage fully with employers who make a reasonable request for information about work capacity was exemplified by a recent unfair dismissal case.
Editor-in-Chief, Employment Law Practical Handbook
In Columbine v The GEO Group Australia Pty Ltd (2014), a corrections officer claimed she was unfairly dismissed for failing to provide medical information about her work capacity.
The employee suffered a work injury and had received workers’ compensation payments. She returned to work to perform modified duties in an administrative position. The employee was then informed that this arrangement would end and that there was no other position available in which she could work with her medical restrictions.
The employee sought to return to work as a corrections officer on reduced hours and a restricted basis. This request was supported by a medical certificate. The employer responded by indicating that it was considering terminating her employment on the grounds that she was unable to fulfil the requirements of her position as a corrections officer and inviting the employee to provide any relevant information prior to the final decision. The employee responded by claiming that she could return to work as a corrections officer on an unrestricted basis.
The employer then told her to provide:
The employee provided the medical certificate and a brief report from her doctor, but did not provide an authority to allow the employer to correspond directly with the doctor.
The employer dismissed the employee (with payment in lieu of notice) for:
In relation to the employee providing the information requested by the employer, the Fair Work Commission (FWC) ruled that:
Nevertheless, the FWC ruled the decision to dismiss was justifiable and reasonable given the employee’s limited engagement in providing the employer with information on which it could properly assess her fitness for work and hence her capacity to fulfil the inherent requirements of her position.
Employment Law Practical Handbook
Please whitelist the Workplace Bulletin to make sure you get every edition delivered to your inbox.
The information in this email is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this email by anyone else is unauthorised. If you are not the intended recipient, please return the message to the sender and delete it from your records. All content is © 2007-2013 Portner Press Pty Ltd All Rights Reserved.
Queries: For general enquiries, email email@example.com or call 1300 782 911.
Workplace Helpdesk: Paid subscribers to the Employment Law Handbook can ask our experts for advice.
Syndication: To republish a Workplace Bulletin article, please email firstname.lastname@example.org for information.
Workplace Bulletin ISSN 1836-117X
Portner Press Pty Ltd
96-98 Bridport Street
Albert Park VIC 3206
- Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR)
- Antitrust & Trade Regulation
- Arbitration Agreements
- Breach of Contract
- Business Organizations
- Business Torts
- Civil Remedies
- Civil Rights
- Confidentiality Agreements
- Constitutional Law
- Construction Contracts
- Consumer Protection
- Contract Disputes
- Electronic Discovery
- Energy & Utilities
- Environmental Issues
- General Business
- Government Contracting
- Intellectual Property
- International Trade
- Labor & Employment
- Mergers & Acquisitions
- Non-Compete Agreements
- Products Liability
- Professional Malpractice
- Professional Practice
- Real Estate - Commercial
- Science, Computers, & Technology
- Virtual Currency
понедельник, 13 октября 2014 г.
Австралия (трудовые отношения). Увольнение из-за несоответствия состояния здоровья. Случай из практики, где работник предоставил справку от врача, но наниматель попросил разрешения лично поговорить с доктором либо назначить независимый медицинский осмотр.