среда, 18 февраля 2015 г.

Австралия (трудовые отношения) Когда отец имеет право идти в отпуск по уходу за ребенком?


Workplace Bulletin
Home | About UsTwitter LinkedIn

Who is the ‘primary carer’ in this situation?
Wednesday, 18th February 2015, by Loran McDougall

In today's Workplace Bulletin:
  • Case Law: When is a father the primary carer for the purpose of parental leave?
Dear Reader,

In the context of the Australian Government’s paid parental leave (PPL) scheme or a paid parental leave clause in an enterprise agreement, you will come across the term ‘primary carer’.
The primary carer of a newborn or adopted child under 18 is entitled to a specified number of weeks’ leave (18 weeks in the case of the PPL scheme). Partners or secondary carers are entitled to a shorter period of leave (the PPL scheme, for example, provides eligible working dads and partners 2 weeks’ leave).
However, what makes an employee the ‘primary carer’ is not always straightforward. Fortunately, the FWC have recently provided some clarity on when exactly an employee will – or will not – be considered the primary carer.
Charles Power takes you through the case in today’s bulletin.
But just quickly before he does...
Recently we launched the 292-page eBook, Effective Workplace Investigations, which was developed to help employers investigate allegations of wrongdoing in their workplace. With an increasing number of investigations being scrutinised in court, it’s crucial that your process is meticulous and fair. This important resource shows you how to make sure it is.
Tomorrow, Effective Workplace Investigations will be available at a special price. Keep an eye on your inbox for details.
Until next time,
Jessica Oldfield
Loran McDougall
Editor
Workplace Bulletin
....................................................................................Advertisement......................................................................................
How do you know when your employees are entitled to parental leave?
Or when their leave should start and end?
Are your casual employees entitled to parental leave?
And what do you need to include in your parental leave policy?
 
Click here to get the answers to these and many more parental leave questions

Case Law: When is a father the primary carer for the purpose of parental leave?
by Charles Power
Editor-in-Chief, Employment Law Practical Handbook
In CFMEU v BHP Coal Pty Ltd (2015), the FWC stated that a newborn baby’s mother must be incapable of providing primary care after a child’s birth before the father can claim primary carer status. Deputy President Asbury went on to say that caring for the mother after birth does not elevate a partner to primary carer status.
The enterprise agreement relevant in the case provided up to 18 weeks’ paid parental leave for primary carers and up to 2 weeks’ leave for secondary carers. Two male employees claimed they assumed primary carer responsibility after their respective partners gave birth by caesarean. Both employees gave evidence that the baby’s mother was unable to be the primary carer because of the caesarean birth, e.g. because she couldn’t bend to pick up the baby or drive a car, and claimed an entitlement to paid parental leave as primary carer.
DP Asbury considered the employees’ statutory declarations (as required by the enterprise agreement) and medical certificates before concluding the employees were acting as carers for their partners rather than as the primary carers for their babies. This did not entitle the employees to paid parental leave as primary carers. Rather, the employees’ personal leave was the proper leave in this situation.
The FWC said the business could not automatically rule out certain medical procedures from being accepted as sufficient evidence of incapacity. However, DP Asbury concluded that the mother’s physical condition “must be such that she is unable to provide primary care for the child” for her partner to claim primary carer status. Examples include when the mother returns to full-time work or is incapable of caring for the baby because of a medical condition. For the purposes of this case, a caesarean was not a sufficient medical condition.
Regards,
Charles Power
Charles Power
Editor-in-Chief

Employment Law Practical Handbook



Like the Workplace Bulletin? Check out our other free bulletins:
Health & Safety BulletinHealth & Safety BulletinAll the latest tips, tools and strategies you need to help you stay on top of health and safety laws. Click here to sign up now.


Self-Managed Super FundSelf–Managed Super Fund Bulletin
Receive all the information, ideas and tips you need to manage your own super fund. Click here to sign up now.



Please whitelist the Workplace Bulletin to make sure you get every edition delivered to your inbox.
The information in this email is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this email by anyone else is unauthorised. If you are not the intended recipient, please return the message to the sender and delete it from your records. All content is © 2007-2015 Portner Press Pty Ltd All Rights Reserved.
Disclaimer: We research our recommendations and articles thoroughly, but disclaim all liability for any inaccuracies or omissions found in our publications. Click here to view our Privacy Policy and Terms and Conditions.
Queries: For general enquiries, email cs@portnerpress.com.au or call 1300 782 911.
Workplace Helpdesk: Paid subscribers to the Employment Law Handbook can ask our experts for advice.
Syndication: To republish a Workplace Bulletin article, please email cs@portnerpress.com.au for information.
Workplace Bulletin ISSN 1836-117X
Portner Press Pty Ltd
96-98 Bridport Street
Albert Park VIC 3206
Australia