ЗША. Адказнасць за спасылкі на чужыя сайты / США. Ответственность за ссылки на чужие сайты

У ЗША сёння з'явілася чарговае незадаволенасць правілам у адпаведнасці з якім ўладальнік сайта не адказвае за спасылкі на матэрыялы іншых сайтаў, якія змяшчаюць ілжывую, порочущую і падобную інфармацыю, якая пераследуецца законам. 

Ніжэй прыведзены спасылкі на некаторыя публікацыі па названай праблеме.

В США сегодня появилось очередное недовольство правилом в соотвествии с которым владелец сайта не отвечает за ссылки на материалы других сайтов, содержащих ложную, порочущую и подобную информацию, которая преследуется законом. 

Ниже приведены ссылки на некоторые публикации по указанной проблеме. 

Websites Not Liable For Content Of Linked Articles

CHRISTIAN NOLAN, The Connecticut Law Tribune

Blogging lawyers in the state may be relieved to know that they cannot be found liable for defamation if they link to or post online a libelous article written by someone else. That was the finding of the state Appellate Court, which ruled that NBC Universal, thorough its cnbc.com website, was not responsible for the content of an article by Teri Buhl, a self-described "smashmouth investigative journalist."

Ryan O'Neill, of the Law Offices of Mark Sherman in Stamford, sued both Buhl and NBC on behalf of a New Canaan securities dealer. The court's decision "is basically saying, 'I know that something is false but as long as it was created by another person, I can sit there and disseminate it all I want," said O'Neill.

Read more: http://www.ctlawtribune.com/id=1202654761640/Websites-Not-Liable-For-Content-Of-Linked-Articles#ixzz31W83S8xq

Supreme Court of Canada Stands Up  for the Internet: No Liability for Linking

The Supreme Court of Canada today issued its much anticipated ruling in Crookes v. Newton, a case

that focused on the issue of liability for linking to allegedly defamatory content. The court provided a huge win for the Internet as it clearly understood the significance of linking to freedom of expression and the way the Internet functions by ruling that there is no liability for a mere hyperlink. The key quote from the majority, written by Justice Abella:

I would conclude that a hyperlink, by itself, should never be seen as “publication” of the content to which it refers.

Read more: http://www.michaelgeist.ca/content/view/6069/125/

Linking and Liability

Executive summary:
Links between content on the Internet are ubiquitous, and no doubt will remain so. Nevertheless, there are questions about the legality of such connections. This portion of BitLaw explains the mechanics of linking, and situations in which links may cause legal problems for their creators.

• what is linking?;
• why link?;
• problems with linking;
  • derivative works;
  • passing off;
  • defamation;
  • trademark infringement;
  • problems with frames; and
• the Shetland Times case

This page was primarily written by Brad Bolin, an intern working for Daniel A. Tysver.

Read more http://www.bitlaw.com/internet/linking.html

Copyright aspects of hyperlinking and framing

In copyright law, the legal status of hyperlinking (also termed "linking") and that of framing concern how courts address two different but related web technologies. In large part, the legal issues concern use of these technologies to create or facilitate public access to proprietary media content — such as portions of commercial Web sites. When hyperlinking and framing have the effect of distributing, and creating routes for the distribution of content (information) that does not come from the proprietors of the Web pages affected by these practices, the proprietors often seek the aid of courts to suppress the conduct, particularly when the effect of the conduct is to disrupt or circumvent the proprietors' mechanisms for receiving financial compensation.


Read more http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copyright_aspects_of_hyperlinking_and_framing